Comey Says He Was DIRECTED By Former AG Lynch NOT to Call Hillary Email Probe An ‘Investigation’ (Video)

Comey Says He Was DIRECTED By Former AG Lynch NOT to Call Hillary Email Probe An ‘Investigation’ (Video)

During Former FBI Director James Comeys’ testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee, he said former Attorney General Loretta Lynch directed him to refer to the Hillary Clinton email probe as a “matter,” not an investigation.

He said the request “confused and concerned” him and led him to the decision to make his independent announcement last July about the case, Fox News reports.

He said another deciding factor was reports about a meeting on a tarmac between Bill Clinton and Lynch.

Comey said he felt obligated to do something “separately” from the Justice Department in order to “protect the credibility of the investigation.”

His remarks came during questioning from committee chairman Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), who asked why Comey made the announcement.

Comey said the tarmac meeting was the event that “capped” it for him. He said Lynch’s direction on how to characterize the email probe was another “brick in the load” in his decision-making process.

At the July 2016 announcement, Comey criticized Clinton for her decision to use a private email server, but explained that he would not recommend prosecution.

In a follow-up later in the hearing, Comey made clear that it was a “criminal investigation” that was taking place. Comey pointed out that the Clinton campaign used “euphemisms [like] security review” to describe the FBI’s work.

He said the campaign’s descriptions of the FBI investigation were “inaccurate” and “gave [him] a queasy feeling.”

Read the rest of the story here.

Total paragraphs: 10
Total paragraphs for ads: 10
Ad locations: , , , , ,

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.