Article 1 of the 1st Amendment clearly states:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Sheriff Joe Arpaio is famous for his Full Press Conference that explained the results of an in-debt indisputable analysis of President Obama’s Birth Certificate 17, July, 2012. And now we learn that his office was raided again and threatened with Criminal Contempt.
Sheriff Joe Arpaio might want to assign one of his investigators to locate a mini-storage for his personal and other critical documents. Perhaps a personal server in his basement might be the ticket for keeping intrusive Obama political operatives out of his business.
Pro-invader U.S. District Judge Murray Snow seems to have made it his personal mission to make an example of Sheriff Arpaio, who dared to defy the corrupt federal government by respecting the Constitution and enforcing Arizona law. Contrary to popular thought, judicial activism does have its place and it is right alongside the abuse of power, inside the Obama regime.
On July 24th Judge Snow ordered Federal Marshals to seize 1,400 IDs and fifty hard drives from the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office. Based upon what they discovered on that fishing trip, Judge Snow sent them back a second time on Friday, this time to take possession of an original hard drive and to make a themselves a copy.
This comes at a time when the federal government is engaged in a program of intrusion into local policing, federalizing forces in order to create, as Hussein Obama said, “A civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as our military. This behavior may be intended to send a message to Sheriff’s around the nation that unless they want to find themselves in a similar situation, they should shut up, roll over and do as they’re told.
The harassment of Sheriff Arpaio is nothing new, and it appears that it will become stronger yet this fall with Judge Snow ordering attorneys on both sides of the civil case which is supposedly the foundation for the seizures to have their calendars open in late September and early November. Arpaio faces civil and possible criminal contempt charges and has petitioned to have Judge Snow removed from the case. Judge Snow has refused to do so voluntarily in spite of what is perceived by the MCSO as clear and demonstrable bias.
According to the Sheriff’s Chief Deputy, Jerry Sheridan, no requests for documents were received prior to the July 24th seizure. That claim is contradicted by liberal Phoenix media station DTAR, which reported, “Snow leveled an angry rebuke toward the sheriff’s lawyers for failing to turn over documents that had been requested months ago. His criticism centered on the agency’s failure to hand over more than 1,400 identification documents in a related investigation into allegations that deputies pocketed items during busts.”
The local reporting appears to clearly line up against the sheriff, both in the earlier video coverage as well as Phoenix print outlets.
Judge Snow’s long-running feud with Arpaio has included assertions by the Judge that Arpaio has conducted an investigation of Snow, suspecting collusion between him and federal authorities involved in a separate federal lawsuit against Sheriff Arpaio. Sheriff Arpaio wasn’t born yesterday; he knows what’s going on but proving it might be tough.
What is at play has all of the appearances of judicial harassment by and on behalf of some federal officials in possible retaliation for the Sheriff’s investigation into document fraud on behalf of Hussein Obama. In that case Arpaio stats he has hard evidence which clearly proves that Obama committed felony document fraud in the false substantiation of his citizenship requirements for being ‘president.’ That lengthy investigation is also said by Arpaio to be nearing its conclusion and will reportedly result in criminal charges being filed.
The actions by this judge are suspiciously like what one would expect to see from someone attempting to uncover the documentation related to that case, discover what information and documents are known and to eliminate as much evidence as possible.
It’s too bad for those obstructing the truth about Obama’s document fraud that Sheriff Arpaio already had the evidence safely tucked away. Maybe he already came up with the mini-storage idea on his own. Maybe he too has friends in high places.
There is now thanks to FOIA reqests done by Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton. He say’s he has “smoking-gun proof,” he says, that top IRS officials “unlawfully harassed taxpayers just to keep them from complaining to Congress about IRS’ targeting and abuse.”
IRS Scandal Update: “Smoking-Gun Proof” Of Harassment:
From the article:
After sifting through 906 pages of documents, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton announced, “This material shows that the IRS’ cover-up began years ago.”
Flashback: Valerie Jarret: ‘After We Win This Election, It’s Payback Time.’ When people tell you who they are, it would be a good idea to believe them.
Pat Dollard reports:
From the article:
Just ask Dinesh D’Souza how making a movie critical of Obama worked out for him. Pattern reveals intent.
Numerous high-profile conservatives say emphatically that D’Souza’s criminal indictment is clearly payback for criticizing Obama.
Photos courtesy of Bing.