Grassley on the Warpath: Demands Ford’s ‘Evidence’ Be Handed Over

Grassley on the Warpath: Demands Ford’s ‘Evidence’ Be Handed Over

Depending how you look at this, it could be construed as justice, or revenge. 

advertisement - story continues below

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley may have won the battle to get Judge Kavanaugh confirmed to the Supreme Court, but he is far from done with the fight the Democrats started to get him there.

Grassley is demanding that Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers turn over the records of communications between their legal team and the offices of Democratic Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Hawaii Senator Mazie Hirono “in light of recently uncovered information.”

In a letter to Ford’s legal team late Thursday, Grassley again requested the evidence be handed over citing that it had been used numerous times to bring 36-year-old sexual assault charges against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

“I urge you once again, now for the third time in writing, to turn over the therapy notes, polygraph materials, and communications with The Washington Post that Dr. Ford has relied upon as evidence,” Grassley wrote, following up on his initial letter sent on Oct. 2. “In addition to the evidence I requested in my October 2 letter, in light of recently uncovered information, please turn over records and descriptions of direct or indirect communications between Dr. Ford or her representatives and any of the following…”

Fox News reports

Grassley requested communications between Ford’s legal team and senators and staffs—“particularly the offices of Senators Feinstein and Hirono,” and communications with the “alleged witnesses” identified by Ford—Mark Judge, Leland Keyser and Patrick “P.J.” Smith.

Grassley also called for records of communications between Ford’s legal team and the other women leveling allegations against Kavanaugh—“Deborah Ramirez, Julie Swetnick, or their representatives.”

advertisement - story continues below

Ramirez accused Kavanaugh of exposing himself to her at a dorm party while they were freshmen at Yale University. Swetnick, who is represented by porn star Stormy Daniels’ attorney, Michael Avenatti, alleged Kavanaugh drugged the “punch” at parties in the early 1980s, and was involved in “gang” and “train” rapes.

take our poll - story continues below

Will You Vote For Donald Trump in 2020?

  • Will You Vote For Donald Trump in 2020?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Truth Uncensored updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

It is unclear at this point what the “recently uncovered information” is.

Ford’s legal team has yet to respond to Grassley’s latest letter. The team only responded to the first letter on Wednesday.

“Dr. Ford is prepared to provide those documents to the FBI when she is interviewed,” Ford attorneys Debra Katz and Lisa Banks wrote to Grassley on Oct. 3. “We have not yet heard from the FBI about scheduling an interview with her.”

advertisement - story continues below

Grassley blasted that response. The FBI completed its supplemental background investigation into the allegations against Kavanaugh, and the report was sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday. The FBI did not interview Ford or Kavanaugh for its investigation.

Republican senators, even swing votes like Sens. Jeff Flake and Susan Collins, noted the FBI did a “thorough” job with the investigation, and that there was no evidence in the report to corroborate Ford’s claims.

“The U.S. Senate doesn’t control the FBI. If you have an objection to how the FBI conducts its investigation, take it up with Director Wray. But don’t raise that objection as a reason not to respond to this Committee’s demand for relevant evidence,” Grassley wrote. “Even if the FBI never interviews Dr. Ford, or interviews her ten times, this Committee has a constitutional obligation to investigate Dr. Ford’s allegations, and that’s what we’ve been doing since we became aware of her allegations.”

Grassley said that Ford’s team’s refusal to provide evidence prevented the Senate from considering Ford’s allegations.

advertisement - story continues below

“I don’t know what other interference we should draw from your refusal but that the withheld evidence does not support Dr. Ford’s allegations in quite the way you have claimed,” Grassley wrote.

The full Senate voted to advance Kavanaugh for a confirmation vote, slated for Saturday afternoon.