Hillary Clinton: ‘I Don’t Want To Repeal Second Amendment, I Want To Regulate It’ (Video)

4
5349

Hillary Clinton told Fox News Sunday that she is “not looking to repeal the Second Amendment,” but she does intend to regulate it and implement more stringent gun laws.

Breitart reported that host Chris Wallace asked Clinton about the existence of an individual right to bear arms, as relates to the Supreme Court’s seminal decision in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008). Although Clinton dodged a similar question twice when asked by ABC’s George Stephanopoulos on June 5, she answered this time by saying “an individual right is in line with constitutional thinking.” However, she hedged in her answer by stressing that no right is free from government oversight and regulation.

She referenced the right to keep and bear arms, saying, “That right like every other of our rights, our First Amendment rights, every right that we have is open to and even subject to reasonable regulations.”

She went on to intimate that we have to do more than pray when a gunman opens fire in a gun-free zone, suggesting it is time for more gun laws.

Clinton said:

Everybody says, oh, let’s pray, let’s send our hearts and our feelings, and then nothing happens.  We’re better than this.  The gun lobby intimidates elected officials.  The vast majority of Americans, including gun owners, support the kind of common-sense reforms that I’m proposing.

On October 16, Clinton held a town hall at Keene State College and said an Australian-style gun ban is “worth looking at” for gun policy in the U.S.

Via National Review:

The Australian 1996 National Agreement on Firearms was not a benign set of commonsense gun-control rules: It was a gun-confiscation program rushed through the Australian parliament just twelve days after a 28-year-old man killed 35 people with a semi-automatic rifle in the Tasmanian city of Port Arthur.

The Council of Foreign relations summarizes the Aussie measure nicely:

The National Agreement on Firearms all but prohibited automatic and semiautomatic assault rifles, stiffened licensing and ownership rules, and instituted a temporary gun buyback program that took some 650,000 assault weapons (about one-sixth of the national stock) out of public circulation.

Among other things, the law also required licensees to demonstrate a “genuine need” for a particular type of gun and take a firearm safety course.

That is what Barack Obama has been trying to enforce, and what Hillary Clinton will succeed in implementing.

Obama Praises Australia Gun Ban: Claims U.S. only Country Where Mass Shootings Happen (October 2013)

Photo:  Bing

You Might Like

4 COMMENTS

  1. God gave us our rights, not MAN, and Hillary cannot abridge any of these rights and no one will abide by them if she tries!! We arent stupid and we see straight through her webs of deception!!

  2. This stops Hillary Clinton from LAWFULLY even running as a candidate for ANY governmental position.

    H. Clinton from lawfully running for, being in, and holding any office within the USA.
    U. S. Code Title 18 Section 2071 – stored wire and electronic communications and transnational records access.

    (a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

    (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.”

    Then consider the Preamble to the Bill of Rights which makes it clear that those who serve within our government have NO lawful authority over the rights RETAINED by the people, and is a PARTIAL list of those rights kept. That those rights are to be PROTECTED by those that serve within our governments as that is what those governments – state and general (federal) were created for.

    Preamble to the Bill of Rights: “Congress OF THE United States begun and held at the City of New York, on Wednesday the Fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

    THE Conventions of a number of the States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, IN ORDER TO PREVENT MISCONSTRUCTION OF ABUSE OF ITS POWERS, THAT FURTHER DECLARATORY AND RESTRICTIVE CLAUSES SHOULD BE ADDED: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best insure the beneficent ends of its institution.” (caps are mine)

    Michael LeMieux says it in an easy to understand manner: “The Constitution has very little to do with the American citizen. It was written to establish a Federal Government and to place the boundaries by which that government would operate. The constitution was never designed to provide or enumerate the rights of the citizens but to restrain the federal government from meddling in state and ultimately citizen affairs.”

    Those that serve within our governments use Color of Law so that they can FOOL the people who never bothered to learn what those that SERVE WITHIN our governments are allowed to do, forbidden from doing, can do only under certain circumstances and in a specific put-into-writing way.

    Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, defines Color of Law as: “The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right. Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state, is action taken under “color of law.” Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, page 241.

    Regarding H. Clinton’s words on speech, she is a liar and here is further proof.

    Justice William O. Douglas, Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949): “The vitality of civil and political institutions in our society depends on free discussion… It is only through free debate and free exchange of ideas that government remains responsive to the will of the people and peaceful change is effected. The right to speak freely and to promote diversity of ideas and programs is therefore one of the chief distinctions that sets us apart from totalitarian regimes.”

    Justice William Brennan, Texas v. Johnson (1989): “If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea offensive or disagreeable.”

    She is a traitor – way beyond a “domestic enemy” – working hard from within to destroy the USA and the American people. If you value owning anything at all; clothes, cars, TV’s, phones, home, etc; being able to decide on a relationship or not, children or not; if you want to decide what food you will eat, what to drink then you better start standing up for the legitimate government, because what they want to implement – and they have been pretty clear and open in what they want – you will own nothing, and make NO DECISIONS regarding your life.

    The “government” will make all decisions for you and they are worse then slavery. So if you are one complaining and using “slavery”, “slave holders”, white slave holders” (guess what, at that time period all colors were slaves and slave holders), etc then why are you fighting and working to put yourself into that position? Go study this for yourself. Go on, VERIFY it for yourself instead of being lead to destroy your own nation and yourself by some criminals who think it is funny that you are too dumb to even know what you are doing – you know, the useful idiot.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here