National Democratic Party Chair Supports Late-Term Abortions: No Limits “Period. End of Story” [Video]


Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the head of the Democratic Party made it clear that there should be no limits on abortion, ‘period.’ Apparently, that includes no limits on abortions up to the day of birth.


Wasserman Schultz responded to a challenge from Republican presidential candidate Rand Paul when he challenged her to answer the question of whether or not she would support aborting a 7-pound unborn baby.

She responded, making it clear she wants no limits from government on aborting babies up to birth:

“Here’s an answer,” said Schultz. “I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story. Now your turn, Senator Paul. We know you want to allow government officials like yourself to make this decision for women — but do you stand by your opposition to any exceptions, even when it comes to rape, incest, or life of the mother? Or do we just have different definitions of ‘personal liberty’? And I’d appreciate it if you could respond without ’shushing’ me.”

Life News reported that a pro-life women’s group, the Susan B. Anthony List, says Paul is right on.

“The current abortion debate is centered on a highly reasonable proposal to protect children after 20 weeks, or five months of pregnancy – the point at which they can feel excruciating pain. The entire GOP field is unified in support of this legislation, which has already passed in fourteen states,” said Susan B. Anthony List President Marjorie Dannenfelser. “While every potential Republican nominee is on record, potential Democratic candidates such as Hillary Clinton are silent. Do they support this compassionate, common sense limit on abortion or do they stand by the Democratic Party platform: abortion on-demand, up until the moment of birth, paid for by taxpayers?”

Dannenfelser pointed out how a November 2014 poll from Quinnipiac found that 60 percent of Americans, including 56 percent of Independents and 46 percent of Democrats, support the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. To date, 14 states have enacted Pain-Capable laws.

A National Right to Life Committee poll found that 63 percent of Americans, and 70 percent of women, support a ban on post-fetal pain abortion. The same poll also found that American women, by an overwhelming majority of 62-27 percent, would be more likely to vote for lawmakers who support this bill.

Watch: Rand Paul SLAMS Debbie Wasserman-Schultz on Abortion: ‘Guess She’s OK Killing 7 Pound Baby.’

Photo courtesy of Google





  1. I wonder how she would have felt if her Mother had her aborted at 9 months. Oh wait, she couldn’t have felt anything but pain.

  2. These ppl for this should actually watch how a late term abortion is done and a full term abortion. I guarantee they will change their minds!!

  3. These two females Marjorie Dannenfelser and Debbie Schultz are KILLERS OF BABIES. I do not care if they are demo’s or repubs these are the kind of women who puts these killing ideas in the heads of our teenage girls and con them into thinking it is ok to kill any baby they do not want. I have a question for these young girls. What if your mothers aborted you? or your brother? or your grandmother aborted your mother or father? the list goes on and on. God favored a women to bring forth life and as far as I can see it you just slapped God across the face. I know there are reasons for not bringing another kid into this awful world as it is today but thnk teenage girl about what you think is right>

    • Please pound your bible elsewhere! People such as yourself are so hypocritcal. She is not saying late term or anything of the kind she is saying that it is a womans choice and not a politicians right to say what they can and can’t do! You spew your religious pious crap and try to make out like it is something so absolutely horrible. Women raped, incest, health conditions etc. Just like a Paul to say let um die. Laughter..

  4. She NEEDS to be shushed! She wants to shush the screaming pain of a 7-lb baby. Muzzle her. I noticed how she supports “women” making their own decisions. Fine. I believe in freedom. But her freedom is not her child’s freedom. If she wants freedom, let her child (maybe it’s a FEMALE!) have her freedom too. LOOKS TO ME LIKE SHE WANTS TO ABORT THE FREEDOM OF CERTAIN WOMEN: ALL FEMALE BABIES SHE WANTS TO SUPPORT ABORTING! Hypocrite!

  5. This is heartbreaking,that a woman finds nothing wrong with murdering full term babies. I can’t wrap my mind around it. This woman not only finds nothing wrong with it but she fights tooth and nail to make it legal. My God, we really need Your help.

    • The reason you can’t wrap your mind around it is that it isn’t true. Nobody has late-term abortions for fun. They have them when they need them – for example, if they are very ill or if the baby is non-viable. Often, the abnormalities that make a pregnancy non-viable aren’t discovered until the 18-20 week ultrasound, which means the ban being discussed here as “compassionate” would have the result of forcing women to carry doomed babies until they naturally miscarried, to greater pain and risk for everybody concerned (including the baby.)

      You, on the other hand, want to force a woman in that position to carry her dying baby for weeks, fielding questions from well-meaning people every single day, and putting her own health at much greater risk as a result. Why is this considered more compassionate? It sounds like refined torture to me.

    • For Heaven sakes where on earth are you getting this crap of full term. When a politican tells you what you can and cannot do that is the scary part! It is not Pauls right to tell a woman that she can’t for any reason have a necessary procedure due to rape, incest, or health reasons. Good grief learn how to read!

  6. People like Wasserman Schultz don’t believe ANY unborn baby is fully human. MANY of them would argue that even after birth a newborn is not actually ‘fully’ human, not until reaching some nebulous age. I know it’s hard to fathom but it IS true. I have no doubt that there are those of her ilk who would find it perfectly acceptable for preemie’s to be killed if the mother decided after giving birth she no longer wanted the baby. After all, they believe human’s are only animals anyway. So (in their minds) what makes them so important? It’s a humanist/atheist view of humanity.

  7. Nobody has late-term abortions for funsies. They have them for one of two reasons: either they have been denied an earlier abortion (for example, due to wait laws in states where they had to save up money to travel away from home to get an abortion) or there is something seriously, tragically wrong with either themselves or the child.

    The person who is already a thinking, pain-capable, fully autonomous human – the woman – gets to make her own medical decisions. When discussing something as heartrending as maternal illness or fetal abnormality, why do any of you think you get a say in what she does?

    • Hail Eris!

      Right there with you, Velvet, and with DWS. Stan, you are full of it. No one “likes” late-term abortions, but they’re what women need, when they miscarry in the third trimester.

      Just because you do not take an interest in politics doesn’t mean politics won’t take an interest in you.

  8. So what is next. Maybe if you have a baby and after even 5 days you decide you don’t feel this works for you so let’s kill the child. Just so you are happy! 9mo. 5 days. same thing, murder! Just looking at the drawing of how they do it shows how evil it is. Kill it before it gets out. Lord have mercy!!!

  9. I believe women should have the right to their own bodies but I think if you need to abort it should be done as early as possible.

    • I would agree. But that does mean making early abortion easier to access – more clinics, no waiting periods, no intrusive ultrasounds, up to twelve weeks. You’d still find situations where abortions after 20 weeks were necessary – for example, fetal abnormalities incompatible with life – but those are never going to be eliminated completely, because they’re generally wanted pregnancies.

    • It also means making birth control widely available. The abortion rate has dropped in the U.S. in recent years, in almost every state, but it’s dropped furthest in the states that made a concerted effort to get birth control (especially long-acting birth control) into the hands of young women.

        • The abortion rate has gone down in some of the radical religious states as well, though not in all of them, mostly due to restrictions to access. That may be a false number, though – how many of those women are now getting back-alley abortions because they can’t get to a major city for two days to get one through proper, legal channels? How many are ordering abortifacent drugs on the Internet, even though they can’t get good information about how to use them? That’s the thing: making abortion harder to get doesn’t stop abortions. All it does is kill and maim desperate women.

    • So you’re happy with murder, then, so long as it’s of a real person. Newsflash: this doesn’t make the rest of us take you more seriously. It makes us think you have no problem with the domestic terrorism that prevents women from getting medical care they need.

  10. ATTN ALL BIBLE THUMPER HYPOCRYTES! Why are you anti abortion but pro WAR. Either you value life or you don’t. Me personally don’t believe the Government should have any say in what a woman decides to do with her body/unborn child. The USA GOP REPUBLICAN PARTY are War Mongers. So you “so called Christians” value a fertilized egg over a 20-25 year old’s life? Those killed or maimed in war have developed relationships with their PARENTS, SIBLINGS, FRIENDS, SPOUSES, POSSIBLY THEY ARE PARENTS ETC … ETC…. WAR IS THE REPUB JOBS PROGRAM. You either VALUE ALL LIFE or NO LIFE PERIOD. How many middle eastern pregnant women have been killed in USA bombing runs? How many have died in the name of your christian Wars? YOU CAN’T Have it both ways

    • Us bible humpiers as u say are neither pro war or abortion but we know choices must be made and if war if an enebetible means to protect our freedom of religion the let it be so. I would not choose war but would rather gladly give my life proclaiming my beliefs. To be honest water has always been a way of life both in Christianity and not but nowhere until modern medicine has abortion been. Open a bible friend and maybe you would learn a few things to gide u on your way but in wither case god bless u and your family. That taking of life is never a pleasure but at times has been necessary. Do these people not see the dirrerence between taking the life of an innocent and defining your rights as in whatever religion u choose to follow. Leave our innocents alone.

  11. As a child is produced they are given a soul a sprit. They are able fell the things a mother feels and even the joys of people for outside their world. These children were intended a life and maybe some not great ones but we are not to judge that. Some children that comfrey the most hideous childhoods become great and inspiring people. What right do we have to take that from them. God is the only one who should have that decision because we are mortal and we’re never granted the control of true life or death. The from our futures and and implicate that we have the right to do this because then we are putting ourselves in a position a both the Lord. It’s not a stand I am willing to take. Let nature and decide intervention make that choice.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here