Obama PROMISES Americans ‘Will Not Be Terrorized’ As ISIS Celebrates California Attackers (Video)


President Barack Obama insisted that America “will not be terrorized” as the Islamic State group praised the perpetrators of the California mass shooting as “soldiers” of its caliphate.

Never one to pass up an opportunity to push his gun control agenda, Obama insisted that more stringent gun laws would ensure events like this do not continue to happen. Apparently, he is not aware that the majority of people who committed mass murders with guns passed background checks. 


Obama’s pledge and extremists’ praise followed an announcement by the FBI that it was treating the investigation into the San Bernardino rampage as an act of terrorism.

Obama somewhat acknowledged this as an act of terror by saying, “It is entirely possible that these two attackers were radicalized to commit this act of terror,” Obama said of Syed Farook, 28, and his 29-year-old Pakistani wife Tashfeen Malik, who slaughtered 14 people and wounded 21 others at a year-end office party on Wednesday.


Yahoo News reported

In its English-language radio broadcast Saturday, IS stopped short of explicitly claiming the attack but referred to the assailants as soldiers of the Khilafah (caliphate) who were “killed in the path of Allah.”

In the group’s Arabic-language radio broadcast earlier in the day, however, they referred to the attackers simply as “supporters of the Islamic State.”

Obama said in his weekly address that the Islamic State and other terrorist groups “are actively encouraging people — around the world and in our country — to commit terrible acts of violence, often times as lone wolf actors.”

“We are Americans,” he added. “We will uphold our values — a free and open society. We are strong. And we are resilient. And we will not be terrorized.”

The carnage marked the deadliest mass shooting in the United States since the Newtown school massacre in 2012, when 26 people, mostly children, were shot dead.

The New York Times Saturday published an editorial on its front page for the first time since 1920, using the rare, prominent placement to urge gun control and lash out at politicians following the attacks.

“It is a moral outrage and a national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed specifically to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency,” it said.

– Evidence of ‘extensive planning’ –

Hours after the attack, US-born Farook and Malik were killed in a firefight with police, leaving investigators to comb through their belongings to try to determine a motive.

“We have uncovered evidence that has led us to learn of extensive planning,” David Bowdich, the assistant FBI director in charge of the Los Angeles office, told reporters.

“There’s a number of pieces of evidence that has essentially pushed us off the cliff to say we are now investigating this as an act of terrorism,” he said, adding that the couple had attempted to destroy their digital fingerprints.

Bowdich said investigators were examining a Facebook posting in which Malik is believed to have pledged allegiance to IS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, made around the time of the attack.

The massacre, if proven to be terror-related, would be the deadliest such assault on American soil since the September 11, 2001 attacks.

Relatives were unable to explain how the couple, who had an infant daughter and seemed to be living a normal life, could have committed mass murder.

“I can never imagine my brother or my sister-in-law doing something like this. Especially because they were happily married, they had a beautiful six-month-old daughter,” Farook’s sister Saira Khan told CBS News.

“It’s just mind-boggling why they would do something like this.”

The family’s attorneys said while the couple were devout Muslims, there was no hint they had become radicalized.

Attorney Mohammad Abuershaid said few people came in contact with Malik, who wore the full-face veil and was soft-spoken and shy.

– ‘Brilliant student’ –

“The women (in the family) communicated with her. Farook didn’t want anyone else to talk to her,” he said, adding that the men in the family had never even seen Malik’s face.

Abuershaid said Farook had met Malik in 2013 through an online marriage site and had traveled to marry her in Saudi Arabia, where she lived, last year.

One of Farook’s colleagues said he was convinced Malik had radicalized her husband.

In Pakistan, Khalid Janbaz, former dean of the pharmacy department at Bahauddin Zakariya University, described Malik as a “brilliant student.”

Former classmate Abdia Rani told AFP that she had “gradually turned religious,” and over time became more serious and withdrawn.

“But we never thought that she had extremist links or even can be an extremist,” Rani said.

A US defense official, meanwhile, confirmed that Farook’s brother was a decorated Navy veteran who won medals for his service during America’s “war on terror.”

Abuershaid and fellow attorney David Chesley said Farook had apparently been teased by colleagues at the county health department, where he worked as an inspector, over the beard he grew.

One witness at the ill-fated party said Farook had suddenly left and returned a short while later, heavily-armed, dressed in black military-style gear and a mask — and accompanied by his wife.

A home-made explosive that failed to detonate was later found at the scene.

– Inside the killers’ home –

The landlord of the couple’s rented townhouse opened their home up to reporters and the public who flooded in Friday, taking pictures and videos in a surreal scene.

Toys, a crib, a prayer rug and documents were scattered through the home where investigators found thousands of rounds of ammunition, as well as a makeshift bomb-making laboratory and 12 pipe bombs.

Authorities identified the victims as six women and eight men aged 26 to 60. All but two were county employees and colleagues of Farook.


  1. So, the Muslim started it, the Muslim admitted it, and the Muslim even warned everybody he and his “Muslim brothers” will keep doing acts like this; in another video a terrorist also had the nerve to comment that “demonstrations like this” force the gov’t to take our weapons and thus make it easier for them. When the terrorists are laughing at him directly in his face why does he keep trying to tell the American citizens they are the only ones to blame because we have a second amendment?

  2. I don’t understand how this is supposed to work. He was the one who wanted better background checks because the violence would stop, plus he was the one who said that they have a great method for background checks that is foolproof for screening terrorists from refugees. The best part of this is the way he is forced to admit to the public that the first violence and problems was the refugee’s fault and we’re not as stupid as he is trying to tell us we are.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here